Texas Tech
Men -
Women
2015
-
2016 -
2017
Switch to All-time Team Page
| Rank | Name | Grade | Rating |
|---|
| 63 |
Benard Keter |
SR |
31:40 |
| 167 |
Miguel Bautista |
JR |
32:06 |
| 848 |
Ebenether Wondaferew |
JR |
33:31 |
| 1,239 |
Eduardo Trevizo |
FR |
34:03 |
| 1,290 |
Nathan Gift |
FR |
34:07 |
| 1,304 |
Todd Mickey |
JR |
34:09 |
| 1,402 |
Nick Rivera |
SR |
34:16 |
| 1,421 |
Joacim Zuniga |
SO |
34:17 |
| 1,454 |
Clark Blunt |
JR |
34:21 |
| 2,419 |
Shea Whatley |
FR |
36:04 |
|
| National Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 10 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Top 20 at Nationals |
0.0% |
| Regional Champion |
0.0% |
| Top 5 in Regional |
0.0% |
| Top 10 in Regional |
22.6% |
| Top 20 in Regional |
100.0% |
|
Race Performance Ratings
Times listed are adjusted ratings based on performance compared to other runners in race.
| Race | Date | Team Rating | |
Benard Keter |
Miguel Bautista |
Ebenether Wondaferew |
Eduardo Trevizo |
Nathan Gift |
Todd Mickey |
Nick Rivera |
Joacim Zuniga |
Clark Blunt |
Shea Whatley |
|---|
| Santa Clara Bronco Invitational |
10/15 |
969 |
32:11 |
32:05 |
33:56 |
34:34 |
34:14 |
33:42 |
34:26 |
34:29 |
34:23 |
35:45 |
| Big 12 Championship |
10/29 |
823 |
31:41 |
31:44 |
33:29 |
33:32 |
34:08 |
|
33:08 |
34:19 |
33:17 |
36:20 |
| Mountain Region Championships |
11/11 |
991 |
31:26 |
|
32:57 |
|
33:58 |
34:34 |
34:57 |
|
35:07 |
|
NCAA Tournament Simulation
Based on results of 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
Numbers in tables represent percentage of times each outcome occured during simulation.
Team Results
| Advances to Round | Ave Finish | Ave Score |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
26 |
27 |
28 |
29 |
30 |
31 |
| NCAA Championship |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Region Championship |
100% |
11.3 |
319 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
1.4 |
5.4 |
15.8 |
24.9 |
41.7 |
9.8 |
1.0 |
0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Individual Results
| NCAA Championship | Advances to Round | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
|---|
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Benard Keter |
70.5% |
65.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.1 |
0.3 |
0.2 |
0.5 |
0.6 |
0.3 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.6 |
0.8 |
0.6 |
0.6 |
0.4 |
0.4 |
0.7 |
| Miguel Bautista |
19.2% |
118.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Regional | Ave Finish |
Finishing Place |
| 1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
14 |
15 |
16 |
17 |
18 |
19 |
20 |
21 |
22 |
23 |
24 |
25 |
| Benard Keter |
17.5 |
0.1 |
0.9 |
1.2 |
1.6 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
3.2 |
3.6 |
3.4 |
4.1 |
4.9 |
3.1 |
3.8 |
3.8 |
3.7 |
3.5 |
3.3 |
3.6 |
3.0 |
3.3 |
2.7 |
2.1 |
2.7 |
| Miguel Bautista |
33.3 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
0.1 |
|
0.1 |
0.2 |
0.3 |
0.8 |
0.7 |
1.0 |
1.1 |
1.0 |
1.7 |
1.7 |
1.8 |
1.7 |
2.3 |
2.0 |
2.6 |
3.3 |
| Ebenether Wondaferew |
77.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Eduardo Trevizo |
94.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nathan Gift |
97.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Todd Mickey |
97.4 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Nick Rivera |
100.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
NCAA Championship Selection Detail
|
|
|
|
Total |
|
| Region Finish |
Chance of Finishing |
Chance of Advancing |
Auto |
|
At Large Selection |
|
No Adv |
Auto |
At Large |
Region Finish |
| 1 |
2 |
1 |
2 |
3 |
4 |
5 |
6 |
7 |
8 |
9 |
10 |
11 |
12 |
13 |
| 1 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 |
| 2 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2 |
| 3 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3 |
| 4 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
4 |
| 5 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5 |
| 6 |
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
6 |
| 7 |
0.1% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
7 |
| 8 |
1.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.4 |
|
|
8 |
| 9 |
5.4% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
5.4 |
|
|
9 |
| 10 |
15.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
15.8 |
|
|
10 |
| 11 |
24.9% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24.9 |
|
|
11 |
| 12 |
41.7% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
41.7 |
|
|
12 |
| 13 |
9.8% |
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
9.8 |
|
|
13 |
| 14 |
1.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1.0 |
|
|
14 |
| 15 |
0.1% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
0.1 |
|
|
15 |
| 16 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
16 |
| 17 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
17 |
| 18 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
18 |
|
| Total |
100% |
0.0% |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
100.0 |
0.0 |
0.0 |
Points
At large teams are selected based on the number of wins (points) against teams already in the championships. As a result, advancement is predicated on accumulating enough points before the last at-large selection. Accordingly, the points below are the total number of wins against automatic qualifiers or teams selected in the at-large process before the last selection.
Minimum, maximum, and average points are number seen in 2,000 simulations of the NCAA Tournament.
| Received By Beating | Chance Received | Average If >0 | Average |
| Baylor |
0.2% |
1.0 |
0.0 |
|
| Total |
|
|
0.0 |
|
| Minimum |
|
|
0.0 |
| Maximum |
|
|
1.0 |
